Sheffield United Rumours Archive May 22 2014
Use our rumours form to send us sheffield united transfer rumours.
22 May 2014 15:44:54
We're interested in signing Walsall skipper Andy Butler who becomes a free agent on 1 July when his contract expires.
Believable12
Unbelievable5
Are defence will be unstoppable
RB:tommy roowe
CB:butler
CB:McGuire (hopefully)
LB:Sheehan/Harris
And just to let people no brandy and Taylor are set to leave the club if the right offer comes in even clough has said it on the website thoughts?
Agree6
Disagree10
Isn't Tommy Rowe a winger and not a right back? Also, if we have Flynn, Murphy, Campbell-Ryce, McFadzean and De Girolamo we shouldn't need another winger?
Agree5
Disagree5
I would give brandy a chance and he could be a really good sub with his pace and skill against a tied defence he would run circles around them but foe Lyle bye bye
Agree5
Disagree7
Brandy and JCR could be good impact subs, and for right back. Ben Davies if he signs?
Agree4
Disagree4
I would play freeman at right back, would have thought there would be some news of his signing after Saturday
Agree4
Disagree3
To answer the comment at the top. Rowe is a mainly LB who can play LM or CM. Very versatile, a leader and a good ball playing player. Would be a great asset
Agree6
Disagree1
In my opinion I think that we should give both Brandy and Taylor another season to prove themselves, we should also give our youngsters such as McFadzean and diego a chance in the squad as well
Agree1
Disagree2
So we will have Sheehan, Harris, Rowe and possibly Freeman. four left backs? What a load of BS!
Agree4
Disagree6
Agree with SuFc4LIFE that we should give them a go, but that's 6 wingers playing for 2 spots!
Agree0
Disagree0
Freeman's a RB, that's why he would be a better signing
Agree2
Disagree1
Rowe is a Utility player and can play in various poitions
Agree2
Disagree0
Freeman is naturally a right back he was just covering for Harris
Agree2
Disagree0
Mcfadzen is rubbish. I would keep Taylor and brandy. Think they could do well. For me we just need a class forward to get 20 goals a season
Jj
Agree4
Disagree3
22 May 2014 12:53:21
Blades to sign o'grady from barnsley, george long going other way as part of deal on loan, jamie ashdown to sign a 12 moth contract for blades
Believable9
Unbelievable10
There isn't any truth in any of this.
Agree8
Disagree5
I would say George will be given chance in pre season
Agree3
Disagree4
Ashdown would be great for us!
Agree1
Disagree5
No one has seen ashdown play on ages
Agree1
Disagree0
Ashdown has only made 8 appearances in the last two years, all in the cup. Ashdown would be a great third-choice keeper for us.
Agree0
Disagree1
22 May 2014 11:55:27
2 possibly 3 signing tomorrow apparently? would love it to be sheehan and o'grady & ayling, interesting to see who comes in at RB, now bray is a no go also if its true about mcginn bid, may be the end of coady interest after 1mill valuation,
Believable3
Unbelievable5
Brayford is not 100 % no go. cardiff just looking at options. Coady fee getting talked about now. Looks like billy sharp coming in.
Jj
Agree7
Disagree4
Andy Butler cb from Walsall linked. Is this a sign Maguire may be on his way.
Agree0
Disagree6
No cus it's not a one in one out policy. Whoever comes in will play with, or as backup for, Maguire
Agree2
Disagree0
Maguire going to prem club. Benn Training with them and its a done deal
Agree1
Disagree2
Not really when he's on holiday
Agree2
Disagree0
That must have been difficult with him being on holiday
Agree2
Disagree0
22 May 2014 10:02:44
We have made a bid for Scotland's under 19s captain and steven mcginn
Younger brother john Mcginn.
Believable5
Unbelievable3
We bid £100,000 and it was rejected.
Agree6
Disagree4
250k bid accepted deal done
Agree3
Disagree5
He signed for us for £250,000 done and dusted
Agree5
Disagree4
We’ll be known as the Jock Blades the rate were signing them up from north of the border lol
Agree3
Disagree1
How can you say a deals been done for £250,000. The facts are a £100,000 has been rejected, nothing else has happened since
Agree2
Disagree2
22 May 2014 00:46:52
The aim is to make all the sites registered only very soon so if you could make the effort to register with a name tag it would be appreciated.
Cheers
Ed 003
Believable3
Unbelievable6